Skip to content
Compare AGF vs Auxerre

AGF vs Auxerre Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs Auxerre: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF AGF Home Team
Auxerre Auxerre Away Team
AGF
52.9
W W D D L D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Auxerre
51.4
W W L D D D W L D D

Categories Won

5

AGF

4

Draw

6

Auxerre

Performance Radar

AGF
Auxerre

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Bech (2 goals)
L. Sinayoko (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

55.5

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

1.98

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.48

Adjusted Power Rating
52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

51.4

Attack: 52.8, Defense: 66.8, Form: 31.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

4
2

76-90+'

1
AGF
Auxerre
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0
Defense 75.1
Form 41.0
Consistency 63.7
Auxerre

Power Rating Breakdown

51.4

Overall

Attack 52.8
Defense 66.8
Form 31.7
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
AGF logo AGF
W
Brøndby (49%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
W
Viborg (55%)
D
Brøndby (44%)
Auxerre logo Auxerre
W
Nice (55%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lyon (70%)
D
Monaco (77%)
D
Nantes (51%)
D
Le Havre (58%)
W
Brest (56%)
L
Marseille (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
43%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
60%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
44%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
48%
Vejle A
2 - 1 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nice H
2 - 1 W
55%
Angers H
3 - 1 W
47%
Lyon A
2 - 3 L
70%
Monaco A
2 - 2 D
77%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
51%
Le Havre A
1 - 1 D
58%
Brest H
3 - 0 W
56%
Marseille A
0 - 1 L
66%
Strasbourg H
0 - 0 D
55%
Lorient A
2 - 2 D
69%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.4 vs 55.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Auxerre holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus AGF's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

AGF has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Auxerre's 1.1.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

AGF

VS
Auxerre

Auxerre

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more