Compare AGF vs Genk

AGF vs Genk Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs Genk: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF Home Team

Genk Away Team

AGF

52.9

W W D D L D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Genk

50.6

W L D D W D W D L W

Categories Won

AGF

Draw

Genk

Performance Radar

AGF

Genk

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

T. Bech (2 goals)

A. Bibout (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

50%

3W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

56.0

League Difficulty: 60.6, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

1.53

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

50.6

Attack: 56.5, Defense: 49.5, Form: 42.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

AGF

Genk

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0

Defense 75.1

Form 41.0

Consistency 63.7

Power Rating Breakdown

50.6

Overall

Attack 56.5

Defense 49.5

Form 42.4

Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 60.6

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

AGF

Genk

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Brøndby A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 0 W

49%

Sønderjyske H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

43%

Midtjylland H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

52%

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

60%

Midtjylland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

57%

Nordsjælland H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

55%

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

55%

Brøndby H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

44%

Sønderjyske A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

48%

Vejle A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

44%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Westerlo H

Belgian First Division A

3 - 0 W

45%

Charleroi A

Belgian First Division A

0 - 2 L

51%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

55%

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 1 D

46%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

50%

OHL H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

47%

Antwerp A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 1 W

57%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

5 - 5 D

54%

Freiburg A

UEFA Europa League

1 - 5 L

69%

Sint-Truiden H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

55%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.4 vs 56.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Genk holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus AGF's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, AGF is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Genk leaks 1.6 per match.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Genk has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

Genk

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair