Skip to content
Compare AGF vs Olympiakos

AGF vs Olympiakos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs Olympiakos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF AGF Home Team
Olympiakos Olympiakos Away Team
AGF
52.9
W W D D L D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Olympiakos
48.6
D L W L D W D W D W

Categories Won

7

AGF

3

Draw

5

Olympiakos

Performance Radar

AGF
Olympiakos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Bech (2 goals)
A. El Kaabi (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

43.3

League Difficulty: 60.1, Opponent Quality: 55.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

1.11

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

48.6

Attack: 34.2, Defense: 74.6, Form: 37.3

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

2
AGF
Olympiakos
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0
Defense 75.1
Form 41.0
Consistency 63.7
Olympiakos

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 34.2
Defense 74.6
Form 37.3
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 60.1

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 55.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
AGF logo AGF
W
Brøndby (49%)
W
Sønderjyske (43%)
D
Midtjylland (52%)
D
Nordsjælland (60%)
L
Midtjylland (57%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)
W
Viborg (55%)
D
Brøndby (44%)
Olympiakos logo Olympiakos
D
PAOK (54%)
L
PAOK (59%)
W
Panathinaikos (57%)
L
AEK Athens (62%)
D
Larissa (41%)
W
OFI (49%)
D
PAOK (54%)
W
Panserraikos (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
49%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
43%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
52%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
60%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
57%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
55%
Viborg A
2 - 1 W
55%
Brøndby H
0 - 0 D
44%
Sønderjyske A
1 - 1 D
48%
Vejle A
2 - 1 W
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PAOK H
1 - 1 D
54%
PAOK A
1 - 3 L
59%
Panathinaikos A
2 - 0 W
57%
AEK Athens H
0 - 1 L
62%
Larissa H
0 - 0 D
41%
OFI A
3 - 0 W
49%
PAOK H
0 - 0 D
54%
Panserraikos A
2 - 1 W
54%
Leverkusen A
0 - 0 D
72%
Panaitolikos H
2 - 0 W
48%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.4 vs 43.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with AGF averaging 1.2 and Olympiakos averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with AGF conceding 0.8 and Olympiakos conceding 0.6 per match.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Olympiakos is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 1.9 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

AGF

VS
Olympiakos

Olympiakos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more