Compare AGF vs Sporting

AGF vs Sporting Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs Sporting: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF Home Team

Sporting Away Team

AGF

52.9

W W D D L D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Sporting

63.8

W W D D L D W L W W

Categories Won

AGF

Draw

Sporting

Performance Radar

AGF

Sporting

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

+11

Clean Sheet

30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

T. Bech (2 goals)

L. Suárez (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 13

Home Win Rate

25%

1W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

50%

3W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

52.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

55.6

League Difficulty: 82.6, Opponent Quality: 64.4

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

2.39

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.19

Adjusted Power Rating

52.9

Attack: 41.0, Defense: 75.1, Form: 41.0

63.8

Attack: 77.4, Defense: 66.9, Form: 52.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

AGF

Sporting

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 41.0

Defense 75.1

Form 41.0

Consistency 63.7

Power Rating Breakdown

63.8

Overall

Attack 77.4

Defense 66.9

Form 52.8

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 82.6

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 64.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

AGF

Sporting

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Brøndby A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 0 W

49%

Sønderjyske H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

43%

Midtjylland H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

52%

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

60%

Midtjylland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

57%

Nordsjælland H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

55%

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

55%

Brøndby H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

44%

Sønderjyske A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

48%

Vejle A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

44%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Rio Ave A

Portuguese Primeira Liga

4 - 1 W

66%

Vitória SC H

Portuguese Primeira Liga

5 - 1 W

54%

Tondela H

Portuguese Primeira Liga

2 - 2 D

52%

AVS A

Portuguese Primeira Liga

1 - 1 D

64%

Benfica H

Portuguese Primeira Liga

1 - 2 L

75%

Arsenal A

UEFA Champions League

0 - 0 D

77%

Estrela A

Portuguese Primeira Liga

1 - 0 W

54%

Arsenal H

UEFA Champions League

0 - 1 L

72%

Santa Clara H

Portuguese Primeira Liga

4 - 2 W

66%

Alverca A

Portuguese Primeira Liga

4 - 1 W

64%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.4 vs 55.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Sporting's attack is on another level, averaging 2.2 goals per match with L. Suárez leading the charge with 4 goals. AGF manages just 1.2 per match.

AGF has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Sporting's 1.1.

AGF has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Sporting has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Sporting is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Sporting has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

Sporting

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair