Skip to content
Compare Anderlecht vs Napredak

Anderlecht vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Anderlecht vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Anderlecht Anderlecht Home Team
Napredak Napredak Away Team
Anderlecht
34.9
D L L L W W L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Categories Won

10

Anderlecht

4

Draw

1

Napredak

Performance Radar

Anderlecht
Napredak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Cvetković (5 goals)
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.5

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 59.1

41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.41

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.01

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
34.9

Attack: 44.1, Defense: 28.4, Form: 18.9

25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

1
6

76-90+'

3
Anderlecht
Napredak
Anderlecht

Power Rating Breakdown

34.9

Overall

Attack 44.1
Defense 28.4
Form 18.9
Consistency 59.2
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

59.1 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Anderlecht logo Anderlecht
D
Gent (51%)
L
Club Brugge (66%)
L
R. Union SG (64%)
L
Sint-Truiden (49%)
W
Mechelen (34%)
W
Gent (58%)
L
Club Brugge (83%)
L
Cercle Brugge (58%)
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gent A
1 - 1 D
51%
Club Brugge H
1 - 3 L
66%
R. Union SG H
1 - 3 L
64%
Sint-Truiden A
0 - 2 L
49%
Mechelen A
2 - 1 W
34%
Gent H
3 - 1 W
58%
Club Brugge A
2 - 4 L
83%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 3 L
58%
Mechelen A
0 - 1 L
45%
Club Brugge A
2 - 2 D
83%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.5 vs 41.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Anderlecht holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Napredak's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Anderlecht conceding 2.1 and Napredak conceding 2.4 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Anderlecht has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Anderlecht

Anderlecht

VS
Napredak

Napredak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more