Compare Antwerp vs Cremonese

Antwerp vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Antwerp vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Antwerp Home Team

Cremonese Away Team

Antwerp

41.9

L L W W W L L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese

36.5

W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

Antwerp

Draw

Cremonese

Performance Radar

Antwerp

Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-4

-8

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

C. Scott (4 goals)

F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8

1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

56.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.2

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 0 matches

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.15

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.05

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating

41.9

Attack: 39.0, Defense: 53.1, Form: 31.9

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Antwerp

Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

41.9

Overall

Attack 39.0

Defense 53.1

Form 31.9

Consistency 49.3

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3

Defense 46.7

Form 21.5

Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

54.2 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Antwerp

Cremonese

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 1 L

46%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 5 L

55%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

4 - 2 W

50%

Standard A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

60%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

35%

Charleroi A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

62%

Genk H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

61%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

52%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

67%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

54%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Pisa H

Italian Serie A

3 - 0 W

40%

Lazio H

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

70%

Napoli A

Italian Serie A

0 - 4 L

79%

Torino H

Italian Serie A

0 - 0 D

69%

Cagliari A

Italian Serie A

0 - 1 L

58%

Bologna H

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

58%

Parma A

Italian Serie A

2 - 0 W

62%

Fiorentina H

Italian Serie A

1 - 4 L

66%

Lecce A

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

58%

AC Milan H

Italian Serie A

0 - 2 L

60%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 56.3 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Antwerp averaging 1.1 and Cremonese averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Antwerp conceding 1.5 and Cremonese conceding 1.7 per match.

Antwerp has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Antwerp has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Antwerp

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair