Skip to content
Compare Antwerp vs Zlín

Antwerp vs Zlín Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Antwerp vs Zlín: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Antwerp Antwerp Home Team
Zlín Zlín Away Team
Antwerp
41.9
L L W W W L L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Zlín
37.7
L D W L W L L L L W

Categories Won

6

Antwerp

3

Draw

6

Zlín

Performance Radar

Antwerp
Zlín

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.5

25 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Scott (4 goals)
T. Poznar (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
56.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.2

55.7

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 54.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.15

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.05

1.65

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
41.9

Attack: 39.0, Defense: 53.1, Form: 31.9

37.7

Attack: 56.4, Defense: 17.6, Form: 31.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

4
3

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Antwerp
Zlín
Antwerp

Power Rating Breakdown

41.9

Overall

Attack 39.0
Defense 53.1
Form 31.9
Consistency 49.3
Zlín

Power Rating Breakdown

37.7

Overall

Attack 56.4
Defense 17.6
Form 31.7
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.5 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

54.2 vs 54.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Antwerp logo Antwerp
L
Charleroi (46%)
L
Standard (55%)
W
Westerlo (50%)
W
Standard (60%)
W
OHL (35%)
L
Charleroi (62%)
L
Genk (61%)
L
OHL (52%)
Zlín logo Zlín
L
Teplice (49%)
D
Ml. Boleslav (66%)
W
Dukla (46%)
L
Pardubice (62%)
W
Teplice (49%)
L
Bohemians (58%)
L
Jablonec (44%)
L
Slavia Prague (69%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Charleroi H
0 - 1 L
46%
Standard H
0 - 5 L
55%
Westerlo A
4 - 2 W
50%
Standard A
2 - 1 W
60%
OHL H
2 - 0 W
35%
Charleroi A
1 - 2 L
62%
Genk H
1 - 2 L
61%
OHL A
0 - 1 L
52%
Standard H
1 - 1 D
67%
La Louvière A
0 - 0 D
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Teplice H
2 - 4 L
49%
Ml. Boleslav A
1 - 1 D
66%
Dukla H
2 - 1 W
46%
Pardubice A
1 - 3 L
62%
Teplice H
3 - 2 W
49%
Bohemians A
1 - 2 L
58%
Jablonec H
0 - 3 L
44%
Slavia Prague H
1 - 3 L
69%
Ostrava A
2 - 6 L
39%
Plzeň H
3 - 0 W
59%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 56.3 vs 55.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Zlín holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Antwerp's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Antwerp is far superior, conceding just 1.5 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Zlín leaks 2.5 per match.

Antwerp has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Zlín has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Antwerp

Antwerp

VS
Zlín

Zlín

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more