Skip to content
Compare Aris vs Malmö

Aris vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Aris vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Aris Aris Home Team
Malmö Malmö Away Team
Aris
46.8
W W W D L D D L D D

Last 10 Matches

Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Categories Won

6

Aris

4

Draw

5

Malmö

Performance Radar

Aris
Malmö

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Garré (3 goals)
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.4

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 48.3

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.32

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.12

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
46.8

Attack: 40.6, Defense: 64.2, Form: 30.4

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

3
Aris
Malmö
Aris

Power Rating Breakdown

46.8

Overall

Attack 40.6
Defense 64.2
Form 30.4
Consistency 62.8
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

56.0 vs 60.5

Opponent Quality

48.3 vs 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Aris logo Aris
W
OFI (44%)
W
OFI (49%)
W
Volos (39%)
D
Levadiakos (49%)
L
OFI (44%)
D
Panserraikos (54%)
D
Atromitos (54%)
L
Panathinaikos (57%)
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OFI H
3 - 1 W
44%
OFI A
2 - 0 W
49%
Volos H
3 - 2 W
39%
Levadiakos A
1 - 1 D
49%
OFI H
0 - 2 L
44%
Panserraikos A
0 - 0 D
54%
Atromitos H
0 - 0 D
54%
Panathinaikos A
1 - 3 L
57%
Kifisia H
1 - 1 D
49%
Volos A
1 - 1 D
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.4 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Aris averaging 1.2 and Malmö averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Aris has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Malmö's 1.6.

Aris has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Aris has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Aris

Aris

VS
Malmö

Malmö

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more