Skip to content
Compare Athletic vs Napredak

Athletic vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Athletic vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Athletic Athletic Home Team
Napredak Napredak Away Team
Athletic
39.8
L W L W L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Categories Won

10

Athletic

4

Draw

1

Napredak

Performance Radar

Athletic
Napredak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 0D, 7L

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Gorka Guruzeta (3 goals)
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
58.6

League Difficulty: 88.2, Opponent Quality: 66.6

41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.48

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.48

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
39.8

Attack: 36.2, Defense: 50.7, Form: 32.6

25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
Athletic
Napredak
Athletic

Power Rating Breakdown

39.8

Overall

Attack 36.2
Defense 50.7
Form 32.6
Consistency 43.3
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

88.2 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

66.6 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Athletic logo Athletic
L
Valencia (67%)
W
Alavés (65%)
L
Atlético (66%)
W
Osasuna (58%)
L
Villarreal (73%)
L
Getafe (72%)
W
Betis (68%)
L
Girona (64%)
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Valencia H
0 - 1 L
67%
Alavés A
4 - 2 W
65%
Atlético A
2 - 3 L
66%
Osasuna H
1 - 0 W
58%
Villarreal H
1 - 2 L
73%
Getafe A
0 - 2 L
72%
Betis H
2 - 1 W
68%
Girona A
0 - 3 L
64%
Barcelona H
0 - 1 L
86%
Real Sociedad A
0 - 1 L
47%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Athletic has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 58.6) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means Athletic's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Athletic averaging 1.0 and Napredak averaging 0.8 goals per match.

Athletic has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Napredak's 2.4.

Athletic has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Athletic has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Athletic

Athletic

VS
Napredak

Napredak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more