Compare Athletic vs Sønderjyske

Athletic vs Sønderjyske Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Athletic vs Sønderjyske: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Athletic Home Team

Sønderjyske Away Team

Athletic

39.8

L W L W L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Sønderjyske

38.5

W L W L L L D L D W

Categories Won

Athletic

Draw

Sønderjyske

Performance Radar

Athletic

Sønderjyske

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

30%

3W, 0D, 7L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-6

-7

Clean Sheet

10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

Gorka Guruzeta (3 goals)

O. Hyseni (3 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

58.6

League Difficulty: 88.2, Opponent Quality: 66.6

54.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 3 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.48

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.48

0.84

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating

39.8

Attack: 36.2, Defense: 50.7, Form: 32.6

38.5

Attack: 34.7, Defense: 45.2, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Athletic

Sønderjyske

Power Rating Breakdown

39.8

Overall

Attack 36.2

Defense 50.7

Form 32.6

Consistency 43.3

Power Rating Breakdown

38.5

Overall

Attack 34.7

Defense 45.2

Form 31.3

Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

88.2 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

66.6 vs 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Athletic

Sønderjyske

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Valencia H

Spanish La Liga

0 - 1 L

67%

Alavés A

Spanish La Liga

4 - 2 W

65%

Atlético A

Spanish La Liga

2 - 3 L

66%

Osasuna H

Spanish La Liga

1 - 0 W

58%

Villarreal H

Spanish La Liga

1 - 2 L

73%

Getafe A

Spanish La Liga

0 - 2 L

72%

Betis H

Spanish La Liga

2 - 1 W

68%

Girona A

Spanish La Liga

0 - 3 L

64%

Barcelona H

Spanish La Liga

0 - 1 L

86%

Real Sociedad A

Spanish Copa Del Rey

0 - 1 L

47%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 0 W

55%

AGF A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

62%

Brøndby H

Danish Superligaen

3 - 0 W

44%

Midtjylland H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

52%

Brøndby A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 6 L

49%

Viborg H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 2 L

50%

Midtjylland A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

57%

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 2 L

60%

AGF H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

57%

OB H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 0 W

50%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 58.6 vs 54.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Athletic averaging 1.0 and Sønderjyske averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Athletic conceding 1.6 and Sønderjyske conceding 1.7 per match.

Athletic has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Sønderjyske has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Athletic

Sønderjyske

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair