Skip to content
Compare Austria vs Malmö

Austria vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Austria vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Austria Austria Home Team
Malmö Malmö Away Team
Austria
44.0
W W D L L D L W L W

Last 10 Matches

Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Categories Won

5

Austria

4

Draw

6

Malmö

Performance Radar

Austria
Malmö

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Boateng (3 goals)
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.0

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.3

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.15

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.15

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
44.0

Attack: 45.1, Defense: 45.1, Form: 41.6

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

3
Austria
Malmö
Austria

Power Rating Breakdown

44.0

Overall

Attack 45.1
Defense 45.1
Form 41.6
Consistency 44.8
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 60.5

Opponent Quality

53.3 vs 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Austria logo Austria
W
Rapid Vienna (53%)
W
Hartberg (39%)
D
Sturm (66%)
L
RB Salzburg (51%)
L
RB Salzburg (46%)
D
Rapid Vienna (48%)
L
LASK (69%)
W
Hartberg (44%)
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Rapid Vienna A
2 - 0 W
53%
Hartberg H
1 - 0 W
39%
Sturm A
1 - 1 D
66%
RB Salzburg A
1 - 3 L
51%
RB Salzburg H
1 - 3 L
46%
Rapid Vienna H
1 - 1 D
48%
LASK A
1 - 4 L
69%
Hartberg A
1 - 0 W
44%
Sturm H
2 - 5 L
62%
Ried A
2 - 0 W
55%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.0 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Austria averaging 1.3 and Malmö averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Austria conceding 1.7 and Malmö conceding 1.6 per match.

Austria has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Austria

Austria

VS
Malmö

Malmö

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more