Skip to content
Compare Auxerre vs Randers

Auxerre vs Randers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Auxerre vs Randers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Auxerre Auxerre Home Team
Randers Randers Away Team
Auxerre
51.4
W W L D D D W L D D

Last 10 Matches

Randers
42.7
D W L D L L D L W W

Categories Won

9

Auxerre

4

Draw

2

Randers

Performance Radar

Auxerre
Randers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Sinayoko (4 goals)
E. Mahmoud (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.5

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

53.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.98

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.48

1.15

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
51.4

Attack: 52.8, Defense: 66.8, Form: 31.7

42.7

Attack: 44.7, Defense: 48.1, Form: 30.9

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

1

46-60'

3
4

61-75'

3
1

76-90+'

2
Auxerre
Randers
Auxerre

Power Rating Breakdown

51.4

Overall

Attack 52.8
Defense 66.8
Form 31.7
Consistency 62.8
Randers

Power Rating Breakdown

42.7

Overall

Attack 44.7
Defense 48.1
Form 30.9
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

86.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

60.4 vs 51.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Auxerre logo Auxerre
W
Nice (55%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lyon (70%)
D
Monaco (77%)
D
Nantes (51%)
D
Le Havre (58%)
W
Brest (56%)
L
Marseille (66%)
Randers logo Randers
D
OB (50%)
W
Vejle (39%)
L
Silkeborg (57%)
D
Fredericia (43%)
L
OB (55%)
L
Copenhagen (63%)
D
Vejle (44%)
L
Silkeborg (52%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nice H
2 - 1 W
55%
Angers H
3 - 1 W
47%
Lyon A
2 - 3 L
70%
Monaco A
2 - 2 D
77%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
51%
Le Havre A
1 - 1 D
58%
Brest H
3 - 0 W
56%
Marseille A
0 - 1 L
66%
Strasbourg H
0 - 0 D
55%
Lorient A
2 - 2 D
69%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OB H
2 - 2 D
50%
Vejle H
1 - 0 W
39%
Silkeborg A
0 - 2 L
57%
Fredericia H
2 - 2 D
43%
OB A
1 - 3 L
55%
Copenhagen H
1 - 2 L
63%
Vejle A
1 - 1 D
44%
Silkeborg H
0 - 3 L
52%
Fredericia A
3 - 0 W
48%
Copenhagen A
2 - 1 W
68%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.5 vs 53.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Auxerre averaging 1.5 and Randers averaging 1.3 goals per match.

Auxerre has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Randers's 1.6.

Randers has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Auxerre has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Auxerre

Auxerre

VS
Randers

Randers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more