Compare AZ vs Heidenheim

AZ vs Heidenheim Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AZ vs Heidenheim: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AZ Home Team

Heidenheim Away Team

56.5

D D D D W L W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Heidenheim

48.6

W D W L W D D L L L

Categories Won

Draw

Heidenheim

Performance Radar

Heidenheim

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

50%

5 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

S. Mijnans (5 goals)

B. Zivzivadze (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

54.7

League Difficulty: 79.4, Opponent Quality: 65.5

59.3

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 65.4

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 5 matches

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.92

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.12

2.61

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.71

Adjusted Power Rating

56.5

Attack: 62.8, Defense: 66.3, Form: 41.9

48.6

Attack: 69.2, Defense: 40.1, Form: 32.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Heidenheim

Power Rating Breakdown

56.5

Overall

Attack 62.8

Defense 66.3

Form 41.9

Consistency 56.8

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 69.2

Defense 40.1

Form 32.8

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

79.4 vs 91.0

Opponent Quality

65.5 vs 65.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Heidenheim

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Feyenoord A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

72%

Twente H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

76%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

70%

Shakhtar D H

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

70%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

67%

Shakhtar D A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 3 L

75%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

56%

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

66%

Sparta Prague A

UEFA Conference League

4 - 0 W

67%

Heracles H

Dutch Eredivisie

4 - 0 W

36%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Köln A

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

62%

Bayern Munich A

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

86%

St. Pauli H

German Bundesliga

2 - 0 W

50%

Freiburg A

German Bundesliga

1 - 2 L

72%

Union Berlin H

German Bundesliga

3 - 1 W

52%

M'gladbach A

German Bundesliga

2 - 2 D

68%

Leverkusen H

German Bundesliga

3 - 3 D

65%

Frankfurt A

German Bundesliga

0 - 1 L

67%

Hoffenheim H

German Bundesliga

2 - 4 L

65%

Bremen A

German Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

67%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.7 vs 59.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with AZ averaging 1.8 and Heidenheim averaging 1.9 goals per match.

AZ has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Heidenheim's 1.9.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

AZ has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Heidenheim

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair