Skip to content
Compare AZ vs Malmö

AZ vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AZ vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AZ AZ Home Team
Malmö Malmö Away Team
AZ
56.5
D D D D W L W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Categories Won

11

AZ

2

Draw

2

Malmö

Performance Radar

AZ
Malmö

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 4D, 2L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Mijnans (5 goals)
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.6

League Difficulty: 79.4, Opponent Quality: 65.2

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.91

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.11

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
56.5

Attack: 62.8, Defense: 66.2, Form: 41.8

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

Goal Timing Analysis

8

0-15'

1

16-30'

3

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

2
5

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

3
AZ
Malmö
AZ

Power Rating Breakdown

56.5

Overall

Attack 62.8
Defense 66.2
Form 41.8
Consistency 56.8
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

79.4 vs 60.5

Opponent Quality

65.2 vs 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
AZ logo AZ
D
Feyenoord (72%)
D
Twente (76%)
D
Go Ahead (70%)
D
Shakhtar D (70%)
W
Heerenveen (67%)
L
Shakhtar D (75%)
W
Fortuna (56%)
L
Groningen (66%)
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Feyenoord A
1 - 1 D
72%
Twente H
2 - 2 D
76%
Go Ahead A
0 - 0 D
70%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
70%
Heerenveen H
3 - 0 W
67%
Shakhtar D A
0 - 3 L
75%
Fortuna H
2 - 0 W
56%
Groningen A
0 - 3 L
66%
Sparta Prague A
4 - 0 W
64%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.6 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

AZ holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Malmö's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

AZ has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Malmö's 1.6.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

AZ emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (56.5 vs 39.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AZ

AZ

VS
Malmö

Malmö

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more