Compare AZ vs Monaco

AZ vs Monaco Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AZ vs Monaco: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AZ Home Team

Monaco Away Team

56.5

D D D D W L W L W W

Last 10 Matches

Monaco

67.7

L W D D L W W W W W

Categories Won

Draw

Monaco

Performance Radar

Monaco

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

30%

3 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

S. Mijnans (5 goals)

F. Balogun (8 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9

1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 13

Home Win Rate

60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

54.7

League Difficulty: 79.4, Opponent Quality: 65.5

69.4

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 64.4

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.92

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.12

2.08

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.28

Adjusted Power Rating

56.5

Attack: 62.8, Defense: 66.3, Form: 41.9

67.7

Attack: 71.6, Defense: 67.7, Form: 71.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Monaco

Power Rating Breakdown

56.5

Overall

Attack 62.8

Defense 66.3

Form 41.9

Consistency 56.8

Power Rating Breakdown

67.7

Overall

Attack 71.6

Defense 67.7

Form 71.6

Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

79.4 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

65.5 vs 64.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%

Monaco

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Feyenoord A

Dutch Eredivisie

1 - 1 D

72%

Twente H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 2 D

76%

Go Ahead A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 0 D

70%

Shakhtar D H

UEFA Conference League

2 - 2 D

70%

Heerenveen H

Dutch Eredivisie

3 - 0 W

67%

Shakhtar D A

UEFA Conference League

0 - 3 L

75%

Fortuna H

Dutch Eredivisie

2 - 0 W

56%

Groningen A

Dutch Eredivisie

0 - 3 L

66%

Sparta Prague A

UEFA Conference League

4 - 0 W

67%

Heracles H

Dutch Eredivisie

4 - 0 W

36%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Lille H

French Ligue 1

0 - 1 L

73%

Metz A

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

48%

Toulouse A

French Ligue 1

2 - 2 D

62%

Auxerre H

French Ligue 1

2 - 2 D

66%

Paris FC A

French Ligue 1

1 - 4 L

77%

Marseille H

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

61%

Lyon A

French Ligue 1

2 - 1 W

70%

Brest H

French Ligue 1

2 - 0 W

56%

Paris SG A

French Ligue 1

3 - 1 W

84%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

2 - 0 W

47%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Monaco has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 69.4) compared to AZ (SoS: 54.7). This means Monaco's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with AZ averaging 1.8 and Monaco averaging 1.8 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with AZ conceding 1.1 and Monaco conceding 1.3 per match.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Monaco has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Monaco is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Monaco has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Monaco

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair