Skip to content
Compare Beşiktaş vs Thun

Beşiktaş vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Beşiktaş vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Beşiktaş Beşiktaş Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Beşiktaş
50.9
L W D L W L W W L W

Last 10 Matches

Thun
41.4
L L L W L L W W D W

Categories Won

8

Beşiktaş

2

Draw

5

Thun

Performance Radar

Beşiktaş
Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 1D, 4L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Kökçü (4 goals)
E. Rastoder (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.0

League Difficulty: 72.0, Opponent Quality: 57.8

37.5

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.32

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.02

1.37

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
50.9

Attack: 42.9, Defense: 69.3, Form: 49.5

41.4

Attack: 46.7, Defense: 43.8, Form: 35.0

Goal Timing Analysis

5

0-15'

1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

3
1

76-90+'

2
Beşiktaş
Thun
Beşiktaş

Power Rating Breakdown

50.9

Overall

Attack 42.9
Defense 69.3
Form 49.5
Consistency 38.8
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 46.7
Defense 43.8
Form 35.0
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

72.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

57.8 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Beşiktaş logo Beşiktaş
L
Trabzonspor (69%)
W
Gaziantep (54%)
D
Fatih (55%)
L
Samsunspor (67%)
W
Antalyaspor (43%)
L
Fenerbahçe (73%)
W
Kasımpaşa (52%)
W
Gençlerbirliği (50%)
Thun logo Thun
L
Sion (70%)
L
Basel (55%)
L
Lugano (54%)
W
Basel (50%)
L
Lugano (55%)
L
Zürich (38%)
W
GC Zürich (27%)
W
Young Boys (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Trabzonspor H
1 - 2 L
69%
Gaziantep A
2 - 0 W
54%
Fatih H
0 - 0 D
55%
Samsunspor A
1 - 2 L
67%
Antalyaspor H
4 - 2 W
43%
Fenerbahçe A
0 - 1 L
73%
Kasımpaşa H
2 - 1 W
52%
Gençlerbirliği A
2 - 0 W
50%
Galatasaray H
0 - 1 L
64%
Kocaelispor A
1 - 0 W
51%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sion A
0 - 2 L
70%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
55%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
54%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
50%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
55%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
27%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
56%
St.Gallen H
2 - 2 D
55%
Luzern H
2 - 1 W
52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Beşiktaş has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 49.0) compared to Thun (SoS: 37.5). This means Beşiktaş's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Beşiktaş's 1.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Beşiktaş has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Thun's 1.5.

Beşiktaş is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Beşiktaş has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Beşiktaş

Beşiktaş

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more