Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Aris

Brann vs Aris Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Aris: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Aris Aris Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Aris
46.8
W W W D L D D L D D

Categories Won

6

Brann

4

Draw

5

Aris

Performance Radar

Brann
Aris

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
B. Garré (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

51.4

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 48.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

1.32

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

46.8

Attack: 40.6, Defense: 64.2, Form: 30.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

3
5

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
Brann
Aris
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
Aris

Power Rating Breakdown

46.8

Overall

Attack 40.6
Defense 64.2
Form 30.4
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 48.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
Aris logo Aris
W
OFI (44%)
W
OFI (49%)
W
Volos (39%)
D
Levadiakos (49%)
L
OFI (44%)
D
Panserraikos (54%)
D
Atromitos (54%)
L
Panathinaikos (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OFI H
3 - 1 W
44%
OFI A
2 - 0 W
49%
Volos H
3 - 2 W
39%
Levadiakos A
1 - 1 D
49%
OFI H
0 - 2 L
44%
Panserraikos A
0 - 0 D
54%
Atromitos H
0 - 0 D
54%
Panathinaikos A
1 - 3 L
57%
Kifisia H
1 - 1 D
49%
Volos A
1 - 1 D
44%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.3 vs 51.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Aris's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Brann conceding 1.4 and Aris conceding 1.1 per match.

Aris has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Aris

Aris

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more