Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Auxerre

Brann vs Auxerre Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Auxerre: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Auxerre Auxerre Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Auxerre
51.4
W W L D D D W L D D

Categories Won

4

Brann

6

Draw

5

Auxerre

Performance Radar

Brann
Auxerre

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
L. Sinayoko (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

55.5

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

1.98

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.48

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

51.4

Attack: 52.8, Defense: 66.8, Form: 31.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

3
5

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

1
Brann
Auxerre
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
Auxerre

Power Rating Breakdown

51.4

Overall

Attack 52.8
Defense 66.8
Form 31.7
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
Auxerre logo Auxerre
W
Nice (55%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lyon (70%)
D
Monaco (77%)
D
Nantes (51%)
D
Le Havre (58%)
W
Brest (56%)
L
Marseille (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nice H
2 - 1 W
55%
Angers H
3 - 1 W
47%
Lyon A
2 - 3 L
70%
Monaco A
2 - 2 D
77%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
51%
Le Havre A
1 - 1 D
58%
Brest H
3 - 0 W
56%
Marseille A
0 - 1 L
66%
Strasbourg H
0 - 0 D
55%
Lorient A
2 - 2 D
69%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Auxerre has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.5) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means Auxerre's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Auxerre's 1.5, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Brann conceding 1.4 and Auxerre conceding 1.1 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Auxerre has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Auxerre

Auxerre

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more