Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Go Ahead

Brann vs Go Ahead Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Go Ahead: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Go Ahead Go Ahead Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Go Ahead
56.1
L D D D W L W L W W

Categories Won

3

Brann

3

Draw

9

Go Ahead

Performance Radar

Brann
Go Ahead

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
J. Breum (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

53.2

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 60.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

2.0

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

56.1

Attack: 68.8, Defense: 61.9, Form: 41.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

2
5

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

3
Brann
Go Ahead
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
Go Ahead

Power Rating Breakdown

56.1

Overall

Attack 68.8
Defense 61.9
Form 41.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 60.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
Go Ahead logo Go Ahead
L
PSV (75%)
D
Sparta (49%)
D
AZ (67%)
D
Groningen (66%)
W
Zwolle (54%)
L
Utrecht (75%)
W
NAC (49%)
L
Twente (76%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PSV H
1 - 4 L
75%
Sparta A
2 - 2 D
49%
AZ H
0 - 0 D
67%
Groningen A
0 - 0 D
66%
Zwolle H
5 - 0 W
54%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
75%
NAC H
6 - 0 W
49%
Twente H
1 - 4 L
76%
Excelsior A
1 - 0 W
60%
Heracles H
4 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Go Ahead has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.2) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means Go Ahead's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Brann averaging 1.9 and Go Ahead averaging 2.0 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Brann conceding 1.4 and Go Ahead conceding 1.2 per match.

Go Ahead has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Go Ahead has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Go Ahead

Go Ahead

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more