Skip to content
Compare Brann vs GC Zürich

Brann vs GC Zürich Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs GC Zürich: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
GC Zürich GC Zürich Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

GC Zürich
27.9
W L L L W L L L L L

Categories Won

10

Brann

3

Draw

2

GC Zürich

Performance Radar

Brann
GC Zürich

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

20%

2W, 0D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
D. Abels (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

50.4

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 51.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

1.0

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: 0.0

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

27.9

Attack: 33.5, Defense: 13.4, Form: 20.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

2
5

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

1
Brann
GC Zürich
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
GC Zürich

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 33.5
Defense 13.4
Form 20.1
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 51.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
GC Zürich logo GC Zürich
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Zürich (42%)
L
Servette (65%)
L
Luzern (56%)
W
Winterthur (42%)
L
Sion (62%)
L
Servette (66%)
L
Thun (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Winterthur H
3 - 2 W
42%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
42%
Servette H
0 - 2 L
65%
Luzern H
1 - 2 L
56%
Winterthur A
2 - 0 W
42%
Sion H
0 - 4 L
62%
Servette A
0 - 5 L
66%
Thun A
1 - 5 L
49%
Lausanne H
2 - 3 L
38%
Basel A
0 - 1 L
51%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.3 vs 50.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus GC Zürich's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Brann is far superior, conceding just 1.4 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while GC Zürich leaks 2.6 per match.

GC Zürich has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Brann emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (45.1 vs 27.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
GC Zürich

GC Zürich

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more