Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Radnički Niš

Brann vs Radnički Niš Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Radnički Niš: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Radnički Niš Radnički Niš Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Radnički Niš
36.1
W W L W D L L L L D

Categories Won

9

Brann

3

Draw

3

Radnički Niš

Performance Radar

Brann
Radnički Niš

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
A. Shestyuk (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

40.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

1.09

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

36.1

Attack: 33.2, Defense: 42.3, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3

16-30'

5

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

2
Brann
Radnički Niš
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
Radnički Niš

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 33.2
Defense 42.3
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 53.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
Radnički Niš logo Radnički Niš
W
Mladost Lučani (48%)
W
Napredak (34%)
L
FK IMT (63%)
W
Javor (52%)
D
Radnički Krag (57%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)
L
OFK (53%)
L
Red Star (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Mladost Lučani H
1 - 0 W
48%
Napredak A
1 - 0 W
34%
FK IMT A
0 - 2 L
63%
Javor H
3 - 2 W
52%
Radnički Krag A
1 - 1 D
57%
Vojvodina A
2 - 3 L
68%
OFK H
1 - 2 L
53%
Red Star A
0 - 2 L
74%
Spartak H
0 - 2 L
28%
Radnik A
2 - 2 D
55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.3 vs 40.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Radnički Niš's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Brann conceding 1.4 and Radnički Niš conceding 1.6 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Radnički Niš

Radnički Niš

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more