Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Charleroi

Brann vs Charleroi Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Charleroi: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Charleroi Charleroi Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Charleroi
42.5
W W W D L W L L L D

Categories Won

8

Brann

3

Draw

4

Charleroi

Performance Radar

Brann
Charleroi

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

0

0

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
A. Bernier (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

42.2

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 52.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

1.03

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

42.5

Attack: 33.8, Defense: 58.4, Form: 36.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

1
Brann
Charleroi
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
Charleroi

Power Rating Breakdown

42.5

Overall

Attack 33.8
Defense 58.4
Form 36.9
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 52.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
Charleroi logo Charleroi
W
Antwerp (45%)
W
Genk (49%)
W
OHL (40%)
D
Genk (54%)
L
Standard (55%)
W
Antwerp (52%)
L
Westerlo (62%)
L
ZW (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Antwerp A
1 - 0 W
45%
Genk H
2 - 0 W
49%
OHL A
2 - 0 W
40%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
54%
Standard H
1 - 2 L
55%
Antwerp H
2 - 1 W
52%
Westerlo A
0 - 2 L
62%
ZW A
0 - 1 L
70%
OHL H
0 - 2 L
47%
Dender A
2 - 2 D
51%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.3 vs 42.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Charleroi's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Brann conceding 1.4 and Charleroi conceding 1.1 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Charleroi

Charleroi

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more