Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Sporting

Brann vs Sporting Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Sporting: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Sporting Sporting Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Sporting
63.8
W W D D L D W L W W

Categories Won

0

Brann

4

Draw

11

Sporting

Performance Radar

Brann
Sporting

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+11

+11

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
L. Suárez (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

55.6

League Difficulty: 82.6, Opponent Quality: 64.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

2.39

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.19

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

63.8

Attack: 77.4, Defense: 66.9, Form: 52.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

3
5

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

6
4

76-90+'

4
Brann
Sporting
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
Sporting

Power Rating Breakdown

63.8

Overall

Attack 77.4
Defense 66.9
Form 52.8
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 82.6

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 64.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
Sporting logo Sporting
W
Rio Ave (66%)
W
Vitória SC (54%)
D
Tondela (52%)
D
AVS (64%)
L
Benfica (75%)
D
Arsenal (77%)
W
Estrela (54%)
L
Arsenal (72%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Rio Ave A
4 - 1 W
66%
Vitória SC H
5 - 1 W
54%
Tondela H
2 - 2 D
52%
AVS A
1 - 1 D
64%
Benfica H
1 - 2 L
75%
Arsenal A
0 - 0 D
77%
Estrela A
1 - 0 W
54%
Arsenal H
0 - 1 L
72%
Santa Clara H
4 - 2 W
66%
Alverca A
4 - 1 W
64%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Sporting has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.6) compared to Brann (SoS: 42.3). This means Sporting's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Sporting holds the attacking edge with 2.2 goals per match versus Brann's 1.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Brann conceding 1.4 and Sporting conceding 1.1 per match.

Sporting has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Sporting is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Sporting emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (63.8 vs 45.1) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Sporting

Sporting

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more