Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Winterthur

Brann vs Winterthur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Winterthur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Winterthur Winterthur Away Team
Brann
45.1
W W D L L W L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Winterthur
33.7
L W D L L L L W D D

Categories Won

10

Brann

4

Draw

1

Winterthur

Performance Radar

Brann
Winterthur

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Ingason (4 goals)
N. Burkart (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

36.6

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

1.46

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

33.7

Attack: 40.4, Defense: 28.9, Form: 17.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

1
Brann
Winterthur
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 49.2
Form 27.7
Consistency 46.0
Winterthur

Power Rating Breakdown

33.7

Overall

Attack 40.4
Defense 28.9
Form 17.3
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

55.6 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Brann logo Brann
W
Fredrikstad (39%)
W
Tromsø (68%)
D
Rosenborg (46%)
L
Viking (70%)
L
Sandefjord (50%)
W
HamKam (55%)
L
Tromsø (63%)
L
Kristiansund (48%)
Winterthur logo Winterthur
L
GC Zürich (36%)
W
Lausanne (42%)
D
Zürich (37%)
L
Servette (70%)
L
GC Zürich (27%)
L
Lausanne (43%)
L
Basel (46%)
W
Luzern (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
39%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
68%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
46%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
50%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
55%
Tromsø H
1 - 2 L
63%
Kristiansund A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bologna A
0 - 1 L
61%
Bologna H
0 - 1 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
GC Zürich A
2 - 3 L
36%
Lausanne H
2 - 1 W
42%
Zürich H
2 - 2 D
37%
Servette A
3 - 5 L
70%
GC Zürich H
0 - 2 L
27%
Lausanne A
1 - 2 L
43%
Basel H
0 - 2 L
46%
Luzern A
2 - 1 W
57%
Sion A
1 - 1 D
66%
Servette H
1 - 1 D
61%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.3 vs 36.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Winterthur's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Winterthur's 2.0.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Winterthur

Winterthur

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more