Compare Cercle Brugge vs Lens

Cercle Brugge vs Lens Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cercle Brugge vs Lens: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cercle Brugge Home Team

Lens Away Team

Cercle Brugge

44.6

L L W W W D W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Lens

58.8

W D D W W L W L W D

Categories Won

Cercle Brugge

Draw

Lens

Performance Radar

Cercle Brugge

Lens

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.9

19 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

90%

9 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

O. Diakité (4 goals)

F. Thauvin (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9

1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14

Home Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

100%

5W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

40%

2W / 5 matches

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

42.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.7

50.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 56.0

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.0

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.1

2.54

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating

44.6

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 37.0, Form: 37.0

58.8

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 50.4, Form: 50.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Cercle Brugge

Lens

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 58.5

Defense 37.0

Form 37.0

Consistency 44.8

Power Rating Breakdown

58.8

Overall

Attack 77.2

Defense 50.4

Form 50.4

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 77.8

Opponent Quality

49.7 vs 56.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Cercle Brugge

Lens

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

La Louvière A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

42%

ZW H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 3 L

54%

Dender H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

35%

Dender A

Belgian First Division A

4 - 1 W

40%

La Louvière H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 0 W

49%

ZW A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

70%

Anderlecht A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

3 - 2 W

52%

La Louvière H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

49%

Sint-Truiden A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

60%

Dender H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

46%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Nantes H

French Ligue 1

1 - 0 W

51%

Nice A

French Ligue 1

1 - 1 D

60%

Brest A

French Ligue 1

3 - 3 D

61%

Toulouse H

Coupe de France

4 - 1 W

40%

Toulouse H

French Ligue 1

3 - 2 W

57%

Lille A

French Ligue 1

0 - 3 L

78%

Angers H

French Ligue 1

5 - 1 W

47%

Lorient A

French Ligue 1

1 - 2 L

69%

Metz H

French Ligue 1

3 - 0 W

43%

Lyon A

Coupe de France

2 - 2 D

54%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.4 vs 50.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Lens holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus Cercle Brugge's 1.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Lens has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Cercle Brugge's 1.8.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Lens has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cercle Brugge

Lens

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair