Skip to content
Compare Cercle Brugge vs Malmö

Cercle Brugge vs Malmö Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cercle Brugge vs Malmö: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cercle Brugge Cercle Brugge Home Team
Malmö Malmö Away Team
Cercle Brugge
44.6
L L W W W D W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Malmö
39.9
L L W L W W D L L L

Categories Won

10

Cercle Brugge

3

Draw

2

Malmö

Performance Radar

Cercle Brugge
Malmö

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Diakité (4 goals)
S. Hakšabanović (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.7

45.2

League Difficulty: 60.5, Opponent Quality: 60.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.0

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.1

1.44

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
44.6

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 37.0, Form: 37.0

39.9

Attack: 44.4, Defense: 44.4, Form: 28.6

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

3
Cercle Brugge
Malmö
Cercle Brugge

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 37.0
Form 37.0
Consistency 44.8
Malmö

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 44.4
Defense 44.4
Form 28.6
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 60.5

Opponent Quality

49.7 vs 60.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cercle Brugge logo Cercle Brugge
L
La Louvière (42%)
L
ZW (54%)
W
Dender (35%)
W
Dender (40%)
W
La Louvière (49%)
D
ZW (70%)
W
Anderlecht (52%)
L
La Louvière (49%)
Malmö logo Malmö
L
Häcken (58%)
L
Mjällby (54%)
W
AIK (49%)
L
Sirius (65%)
W
Djurgården (59%)
W
GAIS (47%)
D
Örgryte (41%)
L
Genk (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
La Louvière A
1 - 4 L
42%
ZW H
2 - 3 L
54%
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Dender A
4 - 1 W
40%
La Louvière H
3 - 0 W
49%
ZW A
2 - 2 D
70%
Anderlecht A
3 - 2 W
52%
La Louvière H
1 - 3 L
49%
Sint-Truiden A
1 - 2 L
60%
Dender H
0 - 0 D
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
2 - 3 L
58%
Mjällby H
2 - 3 L
54%
AIK A
1 - 0 W
49%
Sirius H
2 - 3 L
65%
Djurgården A
1 - 0 W
59%
GAIS H
3 - 1 W
47%
Örgryte A
1 - 1 D
41%
Genk A
1 - 2 L
70%
Red Star H
0 - 1 L
81%
Porto A
1 - 2 L
77%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.4 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cercle Brugge holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Malmö's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Cercle Brugge conceding 1.8 and Malmö conceding 1.6 per match.

Malmö has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

VS
Malmö

Malmö

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more