Skip to content
Compare Cercle Brugge vs Slaven

Cercle Brugge vs Slaven Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cercle Brugge vs Slaven: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cercle Brugge Cercle Brugge Home Team
Slaven Slaven Away Team
Cercle Brugge
44.6
L L W W W D W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Slaven
31.9
W L D L D L L D L D

Categories Won

12

Cercle Brugge

3

Draw

0

Slaven

Performance Radar

Cercle Brugge
Slaven

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Diakité (4 goals)
M. Dabro (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.4

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.7

35.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.0

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.1

1.04

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
44.6

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 37.0, Form: 37.0

31.9

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 31.2, Form: 8.5

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

2

31-45'

5
4

46-60'

3
4

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

1
Cercle Brugge
Slaven
Cercle Brugge

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 37.0
Form 37.0
Consistency 44.8
Slaven

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 31.2
Form 8.5
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

49.7 vs 48.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cercle Brugge logo Cercle Brugge
L
La Louvière (42%)
L
ZW (54%)
W
Dender (35%)
W
Dender (40%)
W
La Louvière (49%)
D
ZW (70%)
W
Anderlecht (52%)
L
La Louvière (49%)
Slaven logo Slaven
W
Gorica (44%)
L
Istra (46%)
D
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
D
Hajduk (53%)
L
Varaždin (54%)
L
Rijeka (44%)
D
Osijek (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
La Louvière A
1 - 4 L
42%
ZW H
2 - 3 L
54%
Dender H
2 - 1 W
35%
Dender A
4 - 1 W
40%
La Louvière H
3 - 0 W
49%
ZW A
2 - 2 D
70%
Anderlecht A
3 - 2 W
52%
La Louvière H
1 - 3 L
49%
Sint-Truiden A
1 - 2 L
60%
Dender H
0 - 0 D
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gorica H
1 - 0 W
44%
Istra A
1 - 3 L
46%
Vukovar H
2 - 2 D
32%
Lokomotiva A
1 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
2 - 2 D
53%
Varaždin A
1 - 2 L
54%
Rijeka H
0 - 2 L
44%
Osijek H
0 - 0 D
40%
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 4 L
76%
Gorica A
2 - 2 D
50%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.4 vs 35.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cercle Brugge holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Slaven's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Cercle Brugge conceding 1.8 and Slaven conceding 1.9 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Cercle Brugge has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

VS
Slaven

Slaven

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more