Skip to content
Compare Como vs AEK Athens

Como vs AEK Athens Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs AEK Athens: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Como Home Team
AEK Athens AEK Athens Away Team
Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

AEK Athens
66.5
W D W W L W W L D W

Categories Won

5

Como

3

Draw

7

AEK Athens

Performance Radar

Como
AEK Athens

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
Zine (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

59.8

League Difficulty: 64.8, Opponent Quality: 61.0

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

1.89

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

66.5

Attack: 65.9, Defense: 76.9, Form: 65.9

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

2
Como
AEK Athens
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7
AEK Athens

Power Rating Breakdown

66.5

Overall

Attack 65.9
Defense 76.9
Form 65.9
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 64.8

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 61.0

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 50%
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)
AEK Athens logo AEK Athens
W
Panathinaikos (52%)
D
Panathinaikos (57%)
W
PAOK (54%)
W
Rayo (68%)
L
Rayo (73%)
W
Olympiakos (61%)
W
Kifisia (49%)
L
Celje (67%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Panathinaikos H
2 - 1 W
52%
Panathinaikos A
0 - 0 D
57%
PAOK H
3 - 0 W
54%
Rayo H
3 - 1 W
68%
Rayo A
0 - 3 L
73%
Olympiakos A
1 - 0 W
61%
Kifisia H
3 - 0 W
49%
Celje H
0 - 2 L
67%
Atromitos A
2 - 2 D
59%
Celje A
4 - 0 W
70%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 63.4 vs 59.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Como averaging 1.8 and AEK Athens averaging 1.8 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Como conceding 1.1 and AEK Athens conceding 0.9 per match.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

The home advantage factor favors AEK Athens, who boasts a 80% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Como

VS
AEK Athens

AEK Athens

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more