Compare Como vs Antwerp

Como vs Antwerp Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs Antwerp: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Home Team

Antwerp Away Team

Como

62.2

W D W L L L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Antwerp

41.9

L L W W W L L L D D

Categories Won

Como

Draw

Antwerp

Performance Radar

Como

Antwerp

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-4

Clean Sheet

50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

T. Douvikas (4 goals)

C. Scott (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

50%

3W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

56.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.2

Elite Opponent Record

25%

1W / 4 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

1.15

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating

62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

41.9

Attack: 39.0, Defense: 53.1, Form: 31.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Como

Antwerp

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0

Defense 71.8

Form 56.7

Consistency 45.7

Power Rating Breakdown

41.9

Overall

Attack 39.0

Defense 53.1

Form 31.9

Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 54.2

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%

Como

Antwerp

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Verona A

Italian Serie A

1 - 0 W

55%

Napoli H

Italian Serie A

0 - 0 D

74%

Genoa A

Italian Serie A

2 - 0 W

67%

Inter Milan A

Coppa Italia

2 - 3 L

66%

Sassuolo A

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

69%

Inter Milan H

Italian Serie A

3 - 4 L

78%

Udinese A

Italian Serie A

0 - 0 D

79%

Pisa H

Italian Serie A

5 - 0 W

40%

Roma H

Italian Serie A

2 - 1 W

70%

Cagliari A

Italian Serie A

2 - 1 W

58%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 1 L

46%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 5 L

55%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

4 - 2 W

50%

Standard A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

60%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

35%

Charleroi A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

62%

Genk H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

61%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

52%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

67%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

54%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 63.4 vs 56.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Como holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Antwerp's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Como has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Antwerp's 1.5.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Antwerp has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Como emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (62.2 vs 41.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Antwerp

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair