Skip to content
Compare Como vs Auxerre

Como vs Auxerre Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs Auxerre: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Como Home Team
Auxerre Auxerre Away Team
Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Auxerre
51.4
W W L D D D W L D D

Categories Won

9

Como

4

Draw

2

Auxerre

Performance Radar

Como
Auxerre

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
L. Sinayoko (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

55.5

League Difficulty: 86.0, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

1.98

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.48

Adjusted Power Rating
62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

51.4

Attack: 52.8, Defense: 66.8, Form: 31.7

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

1
Como
Auxerre
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7
Auxerre

Power Rating Breakdown

51.4

Overall

Attack 52.8
Defense 66.8
Form 31.7
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 86.0

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)
Auxerre logo Auxerre
W
Nice (55%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lyon (70%)
D
Monaco (77%)
D
Nantes (51%)
D
Le Havre (58%)
W
Brest (56%)
L
Marseille (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nice H
2 - 1 W
55%
Angers H
3 - 1 W
47%
Lyon A
2 - 3 L
70%
Monaco A
2 - 2 D
77%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
51%
Le Havre A
1 - 1 D
58%
Brest H
3 - 0 W
56%
Marseille A
0 - 1 L
66%
Strasbourg H
0 - 0 D
55%
Lorient A
2 - 2 D
69%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 63.4 vs 55.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Como holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Auxerre's 1.5, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Como conceding 1.1 and Auxerre conceding 1.1 per match.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Como has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Como

VS
Auxerre

Auxerre

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more