Skip to content
Compare Como vs Copenhagen

Como vs Copenhagen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs Copenhagen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Como Home Team
Copenhagen Copenhagen Away Team
Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Copenhagen
68.2
W D W W W W W L L L

Categories Won

4

Como

1

Draw

10

Copenhagen

Performance Radar

Como
Copenhagen

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.8

28 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+16

+16

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

100%

10 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
Y. Moukoko (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 14 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

51.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 48.6

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

2.87

Actual: 2.8 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

68.2

Attack: 94.5, Defense: 60.7, Form: 60.7

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

5
1

16-30'

5
3

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

11
Como
Copenhagen
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7
Copenhagen

Power Rating Breakdown

68.2

Overall

Attack 94.5
Defense 60.7
Form 60.7
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 48.6

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)
Copenhagen logo Copenhagen
W
Silkeborg (57%)
D
Fredericia (48%)
W
Vejle (39%)
W
OB (50%)
W
Vejle (44%)
W
Randers (52%)
W
Silkeborg (52%)
L
Fredericia (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Silkeborg A
4 - 0 W
57%
Fredericia A
3 - 3 D
48%
Vejle H
3 - 0 W
39%
OB H
2 - 1 W
50%
Vejle A
4 - 1 W
44%
Randers A
2 - 1 W
52%
Silkeborg H
7 - 0 W
52%
Fredericia H
1 - 2 L
43%
OB A
1 - 2 L
55%
Randers H
1 - 2 L
46%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Como has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.4) compared to Copenhagen (SoS: 51.2). This means Como's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Copenhagen holds the attacking edge with 2.8 goals per match versus Como's 1.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Como conceding 1.1 and Copenhagen conceding 1.2 per match.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Copenhagen has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Copenhagen is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Copenhagen has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Como

VS
Copenhagen

Copenhagen

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more