Skip to content
Compare Como vs LNZ Cherkasy

Como vs LNZ Cherkasy Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs LNZ Cherkasy: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Como Home Team
LNZ Cherkasy LNZ Cherkasy Away Team
Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

LNZ Cherkasy
60.7
D D D L D W W W W L

Categories Won

10

Como

2

Draw

3

LNZ Cherkasy

Performance Radar

Como
LNZ Cherkasy

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
M. Assinor (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

67.6

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.2

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

1.53

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

60.7

Attack: 54.9, Defense: 86.2, Form: 47.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

5
Como
LNZ Cherkasy
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7
LNZ Cherkasy

Power Rating Breakdown

60.7

Overall

Attack 54.9
Defense 86.2
Form 47.0
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 71.2

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 14%
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)
LNZ Cherkasy logo LNZ Cherkasy
D
Dynamo Kyiv (78%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (86%)
D
Metalist 1925 (74%)
L
Kolos (83%)
D
Shakhtar D (78%)
W
Kryvbas KR (76%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (49%)
W
Oleksandria (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dynamo Kyiv H
0 - 0 D
78%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 0 D
86%
Metalist 1925 H
1 - 1 D
74%
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
83%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
78%
Kryvbas KR A
3 - 0 W
76%
Rukh Vynnyky A
2 - 1 W
49%
Oleksandria H
2 - 0 W
44%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 0 W
67%
Polissya H
1 - 3 L
77%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 63.4 vs 67.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Como holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus LNZ Cherkasy's 1.4, though the gap is not insurmountable.

LNZ Cherkasy has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to Como's 1.1.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

LNZ Cherkasy has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

LNZ Cherkasy is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Como

VS
LNZ Cherkasy

LNZ Cherkasy

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more