Skip to content
Compare Como vs Napredak

Como vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Como Home Team
Napredak Napredak Away Team
Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Napredak
25.8
W L L L L L L L D L

Categories Won

13

Como

1

Draw

1

Napredak

Performance Radar

Como
Napredak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

10%

1W, 1D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
N. Bogdanovski (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

41.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

0.82

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

25.8

Attack: 24.4, Defense: 18.3, Form: 9.1

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
Como
Napredak
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7
Napredak

Power Rating Breakdown

25.8

Overall

Attack 24.4
Defense 18.3
Form 9.1
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)
Napredak logo Napredak
W
Spartak (33%)
L
Radnički Niš (44%)
L
Javor (56%)
L
FK IMT (58%)
L
TSC (60%)
L
Mladost Lučani (53%)
L
TSC (56%)
L
Vojvodina (68%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartak A
3 - 0 W
33%
Radnički Niš H
0 - 1 L
44%
Javor A
0 - 4 L
56%
FK IMT H
0 - 1 L
58%
TSC A
1 - 4 L
60%
Mladost Lučani A
0 - 2 L
53%
TSC H
1 - 2 L
56%
Vojvodina A
1 - 4 L
68%
OFK H
2 - 2 D
53%
Red Star A
0 - 4 L
74%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Como has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 63.4) compared to Napredak (SoS: 41.4). This means Como's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Como's attack is on another level, averaging 1.8 goals per match with T. Douvikas leading the charge with 4 goals. Napredak manages just 0.8 per match.

Defensively, Como is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 5 clean sheets, while Napredak leaks 2.4 per match.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Como is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (68.0), defense (71.8), and form (56.7) leaves little room for doubt. Napredak will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Como

VS
Napredak

Napredak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more