Skip to content
Compare Como vs Leipzig

Como vs Leipzig Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Como vs Leipzig: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Como Como Home Team
Leipzig Leipzig Away Team
Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Leipzig
74.6
W L W W W W W L W W

Categories Won

3

Como

3

Draw

9

Leipzig

Performance Radar

Como
Leipzig

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

80%

8W, 0D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+10

+10

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
Y. Diomande (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

100%

5W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

58.7

League Difficulty: 91.0, Opponent Quality: 63.8

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

2.71

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.61

Adjusted Power Rating
62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

74.6

Attack: 76.1, Defense: 68.8, Form: 87.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

6
3

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

6
Como
Leipzig
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7
Leipzig

Power Rating Breakdown

74.6

Overall

Attack 76.1
Defense 68.8
Form 87.0
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.5 vs 91.0

Opponent Quality

65.6 vs 63.8

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)
Leipzig logo Leipzig
W
St. Pauli (50%)
L
Leverkusen (70%)
W
Union Berlin (52%)
W
Frankfurt (67%)
W
M'gladbach (63%)
W
Bremen (67%)
W
Hoffenheim (65%)
L
Stuttgart (75%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
St. Pauli H
2 - 1 W
50%
Leverkusen A
1 - 4 L
70%
Union Berlin H
3 - 1 W
52%
Frankfurt A
3 - 1 W
67%
M'gladbach H
1 - 0 W
63%
Bremen A
2 - 1 W
67%
Hoffenheim H
5 - 0 W
65%
Stuttgart A
0 - 1 L
75%
Augsburg H
2 - 1 W
66%
Hamburg A
2 - 1 W
63%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 63.4 vs 58.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Leipzig holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus Como's 1.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Como conceding 1.1 and Leipzig conceding 1.1 per match.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

The home advantage factor favors Leipzig, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Leipzig is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Leipzig has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.4 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Como

Como

VS
Leipzig

Leipzig

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more