Skip to content
Compare Cremonese vs Górnik

Cremonese vs Górnik Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cremonese vs Górnik: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cremonese Cremonese Home Team
Górnik Górnik Away Team
Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Górnik
50.0
L W W D W D W D L L

Categories Won

4

Cremonese

3

Draw

8

Górnik

Performance Radar

Cremonese
Górnik

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
R. Janicki (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

54.8

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 53.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

1.14

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

50.0

Attack: 38.4, Defense: 73.4, Form: 41.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

5
Cremonese
Górnik
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7
Górnik

Power Rating Breakdown

50.0

Overall

Attack 38.4
Defense 73.4
Form 41.9
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

90.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

62.0 vs 53.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)
Górnik logo Górnik
L
Zagłębie (49%)
W
Jagiellonia (53%)
W
Kielce (43%)
D
Legia (64%)
W
Cracovia (40%)
D
Widzew (59%)
W
Raków (54%)
D
Motor (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zagłębie H
0 - 2 L
49%
Jagiellonia A
2 - 1 W
53%
Kielce H
1 - 0 W
43%
Legia A
1 - 1 D
64%
Cracovia H
3 - 0 W
40%
Widzew A
0 - 0 D
59%
Raków H
3 - 1 W
54%
Motor A
0 - 0 D
59%
GKS Katowice A
1 - 3 L
64%
Pogoń H
0 - 1 L
49%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.7 vs 54.8), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Cremonese averaging 0.9 and Górnik averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Górnik has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Cremonese's 1.7.

Górnik has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.3 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Górnik has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cremonese

Cremonese

VS
Górnik

Górnik

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more