Skip to content
Compare Cremonese vs Winterthur

Cremonese vs Winterthur Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cremonese vs Winterthur: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cremonese Cremonese Home Team
Winterthur Winterthur Away Team
Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Winterthur
33.7
L W D L L L L W D D

Categories Won

5

Cremonese

5

Draw

5

Winterthur

Performance Radar

Cremonese
Winterthur

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
N. Burkart (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

36.6

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

1.46

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

33.7

Attack: 40.4, Defense: 28.9, Form: 17.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

1
Cremonese
Winterthur
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7
Winterthur

Power Rating Breakdown

33.7

Overall

Attack 40.4
Defense 28.9
Form 17.3
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

90.0 vs 49.0

Opponent Quality

62.0 vs 48.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)
Winterthur logo Winterthur
L
GC Zürich (36%)
W
Lausanne (42%)
D
Zürich (37%)
L
Servette (70%)
L
GC Zürich (27%)
L
Lausanne (43%)
L
Basel (46%)
W
Luzern (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
GC Zürich A
2 - 3 L
36%
Lausanne H
2 - 1 W
42%
Zürich H
2 - 2 D
37%
Servette A
3 - 5 L
70%
GC Zürich H
0 - 2 L
27%
Lausanne A
1 - 2 L
43%
Basel H
0 - 2 L
46%
Luzern A
2 - 1 W
57%
Sion A
1 - 1 D
66%
Servette H
1 - 1 D
61%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Cremonese has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.7) compared to Winterthur (SoS: 36.6). This means Cremonese's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Winterthur holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Cremonese's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Cremonese has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to Winterthur's 2.0.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cremonese

Cremonese

VS
Winterthur

Winterthur

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more