Compare Dender vs Antwerp

Dender vs Antwerp Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Antwerp: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

Antwerp Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Antwerp

41.9

L L W W W L L L D D

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

Antwerp

Performance Radar

Dender

Antwerp

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

-4

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

C. Scott (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

56.3

League Difficulty: 59.5, Opponent Quality: 54.2

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

1.15

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

41.9

Attack: 39.0, Defense: 53.1, Form: 31.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

Antwerp

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

41.9

Overall

Attack 39.0

Defense 53.1

Form 31.9

Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 59.5

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 54.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Dender

Antwerp

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Charleroi H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 1 L

46%

Standard H

Belgian First Division A

0 - 5 L

55%

Westerlo A

Belgian First Division A

4 - 2 W

50%

Standard A

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

60%

OHL H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 0 W

35%

Charleroi A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

62%

Genk H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

61%

OHL A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 1 L

52%

Standard H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 1 D

67%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

54%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Antwerp has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 56.3) compared to Dender (SoS: 44.9). This means Antwerp's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Dender averaging 1.0 and Antwerp averaging 1.1 goals per match.

Antwerp has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Antwerp has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Antwerp has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Antwerp

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair