Compare Dender vs Atromitos

Dender vs Atromitos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Atromitos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

Atromitos Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Atromitos

53.5

W L L W W W D D L D

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

Atromitos

Performance Radar

Dender

Atromitos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

M. Baku (6 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

54.0

League Difficulty: 56.0, Opponent Quality: 52.7

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

1.99

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.19

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

53.5

Attack: 62.4, Defense: 58.9, Form: 41.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

Atromitos

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

53.5

Overall

Attack 62.4

Defense 58.9

Form 41.6

Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 56.0

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 52.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Dender

Atromitos

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Kifisia A

Greek Super League

3 - 0 W

54%

Panaitolikos H

Greek Super League

1 - 2 L

48%

Asteras A

Greek Super League

2 - 4 L

61%

Asteras H

Greek Super League

2 - 1 W

56%

Panserraikos A

Greek Super League

4 - 0 W

54%

Larissa H

Greek Super League

3 - 2 W

41%

Kifisia H

Greek Super League

0 - 0 D

49%

Panaitolikos A

Greek Super League

1 - 1 D

53%

Levadiakos A

Greek Super League

0 - 1 L

49%

AEK Athens H

Greek Super League

2 - 2 D

62%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.9 vs 54.0), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Atromitos holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Dender's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Atromitos has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Atromitos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Atromitos emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (53.5 vs 33.6) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Atromitos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair