Compare Dender vs Brann

Dender vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

Brann Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Brann

45.1

W W D L L W L L L L

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

Brann

Performance Radar

Dender

Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

K. Ingason (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

42.3

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

2.14

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

45.1

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 49.2, Form: 27.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 58.5

Defense 49.2

Form 27.7

Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 55.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Dender

Brann

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Fredrikstad H

Norwegian Eliteserien

3 - 1 W

39%

Tromsø A

Norwegian Eliteserien

5 - 0 W

68%

Rosenborg A

Norwegian Eliteserien

1 - 1 D

46%

Viking A

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 3 L

70%

Sandefjord H

Norwegian Eliteserien

0 - 1 L

50%

HamKam A

Norwegian Eliteserien

5 - 1 W

55%

Tromsø H

Norwegian Eliteserien

1 - 2 L

63%

Kristiansund A

Norwegian Eliteserien

2 - 3 L

48%

Bologna A

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

61%

Bologna H

UEFA Europa League

0 - 1 L

56%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.9 vs 42.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Dender's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair