Compare Dender vs Brøndby

Dender vs Brøndby Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Brøndby: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

Brøndby Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Brøndby

42.4

L D L W W L L D L D

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

Brøndby

Performance Radar

Dender

Brøndby

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

-1

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

J. Ambæk (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

1.03

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.03

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

42.4

Attack: 34.8, Defense: 66.1, Form: 20.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

Brøndby

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

42.4

Overall

Attack 34.8

Defense 66.1

Form 20.9

Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Dender

Brøndby

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

AGF H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 2 L

57%

Nordsjælland H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

55%

Sønderjyske A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 3 L

48%

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 0 W

55%

Sønderjyske H

Danish Superligaen

6 - 0 W

43%

Midtjylland H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

52%

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

60%

AGF A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

62%

Viborg H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 1 L

50%

Midtjylland A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

57%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.9 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Dender averaging 1.0 and Brøndby averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Brøndby has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Brøndby has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Brøndby has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.8 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Brøndby

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair