Compare Dender vs Copenhagen

Dender vs Copenhagen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Copenhagen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

Copenhagen Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Copenhagen

68.2

W D W W W W W L L L

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

Copenhagen

Performance Radar

Dender

Copenhagen

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

2.8

28 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

+16

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

100%

10 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

Y. Moukoko (5 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 14 / 2nd Half: 14

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

51.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 48.6

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

2.87

Actual: 2.8 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

68.2

Attack: 94.5, Defense: 60.7, Form: 60.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

Copenhagen

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

68.2

Overall

Attack 94.5

Defense 60.7

Form 60.7

Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 48.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Dender

Copenhagen

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Silkeborg A

Danish Superligaen

4 - 0 W

57%

Fredericia A

Danish Superligaen

3 - 3 D

48%

Vejle H

Danish Superligaen

3 - 0 W

39%

OB H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

50%

Vejle A

Danish Superligaen

4 - 1 W

44%

Randers A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

52%

Silkeborg H

Danish Superligaen

7 - 0 W

52%

Fredericia H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

43%

OB A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

55%

Randers H

Danish Superligaen

1 - 2 L

46%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.9 vs 51.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Copenhagen's attack is on another level, averaging 2.8 goals per match with Y. Moukoko leading the charge with 5 goals. Dender manages just 1.0 per match.

Copenhagen has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Copenhagen has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Copenhagen is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Copenhagen is the clear and decisive favorite. Their superiority across attack (94.5), defense (60.7), and form (60.7) leaves little room for doubt. Dender will need an exceptional performance to compete.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Copenhagen

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair