Compare Dender vs Cremonese

Dender vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

Cremonese Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese

36.5

W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

Cremonese

Performance Radar

Dender

Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3

Defense 46.7

Form 21.5

Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Dender

Cremonese

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Pisa H

Italian Serie A

3 - 0 W

40%

Lazio H

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

70%

Napoli A

Italian Serie A

0 - 4 L

79%

Torino H

Italian Serie A

0 - 0 D

69%

Cagliari A

Italian Serie A

0 - 1 L

58%

Bologna H

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

58%

Parma A

Italian Serie A

2 - 0 W

62%

Fiorentina H

Italian Serie A

1 - 4 L

66%

Lecce A

Italian Serie A

1 - 2 L

58%

AC Milan H

Italian Serie A

0 - 2 L

60%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Cremonese has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 57.7) compared to Dender (SoS: 44.9). This means Cremonese's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Dender averaging 1.0 and Cremonese averaging 0.9 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Dender conceding 1.8 and Cremonese conceding 1.7 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair