Compare Dender vs Midtjylland

Dender vs Midtjylland Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Midtjylland: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

Midtjylland Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Midtjylland

43.7

D D D W W W D D L L

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

Midtjylland

Performance Radar

Dender

Midtjylland

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

M. Erlić (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

42.6

League Difficulty: 58.0, Opponent Quality: 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

1.36

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

43.7

Attack: 40.1, Defense: 55.6, Form: 27.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

Midtjylland

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

43.7

Overall

Attack 40.1

Defense 55.6

Form 27.8

Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 58.0

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 55.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Dender

Midtjylland

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Nordsjælland A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

60%

Viborg H

Danish Superligaen

3 - 3 D

50%

AGF A

Danish Superligaen

0 - 0 D

62%

Sønderjyske A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

48%

AGF H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

57%

Brøndby A

Danish Superligaen

2 - 1 W

49%

Sønderjyske H

Danish Superligaen

2 - 2 D

43%

Viborg A

Danish Superligaen

1 - 1 D

55%

Nottm Forest H

UEFA Europa League

1 - 2 L

76%

Nordsjælland H

Danish Superligaen

0 - 1 L

55%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.9 vs 42.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Midtjylland holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Dender's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Midtjylland has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Midtjylland has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.1 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Midtjylland

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair