Skip to content
Compare Dender vs Panathinaikos

Dender vs Panathinaikos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs Panathinaikos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Dender Home Team
Panathinaikos Panathinaikos Away Team
Dender
33.6
L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Panathinaikos
45.5
L D L D W L D W W W

Categories Won

3

Dender

3

Draw

9

Panathinaikos

Performance Radar

Dender
Panathinaikos

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
D. Hrnčár (2 goals)
A. Zaroury (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

45.1

League Difficulty: 61.8, Opponent Quality: 58.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

0.95

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.25

Adjusted Power Rating
33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

45.5

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 60.2, Form: 38.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

3

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

2
Dender
Panathinaikos
Dender

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6
Defense 38.0
Form 19.0
Consistency 59.2
Panathinaikos

Power Rating Breakdown

45.5

Overall

Attack 38.0
Defense 60.2
Form 38.0
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 61.8

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 58.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Dender logo Dender
L
ZW (59%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
L
Cercle Brugge (51%)
L
Cercle Brugge (46%)
L
ZW (65%)
W
La Louvière (54%)
L
Gent (58%)
L
R. Union SG (80%)
Panathinaikos logo Panathinaikos
L
AEK Athens (67%)
D
AEK Athens (62%)
L
Olympiakos (56%)
D
PAOK (59%)
W
Asteras (61%)
L
Betis (70%)
D
Panaitolikos (48%)
W
Betis (65%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
ZW A
1 - 2 L
59%
La Louvière H
2 - 1 W
38%
Cercle Brugge A
1 - 2 L
51%
Cercle Brugge H
1 - 4 L
46%
ZW H
1 - 2 L
65%
La Louvière A
1 - 0 W
54%
Gent H
1 - 3 L
58%
R. Union SG A
0 - 2 L
80%
Charleroi H
2 - 2 D
57%
Cercle Brugge A
0 - 0 D
63%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AEK Athens A
1 - 2 L
67%
AEK Athens H
0 - 0 D
62%
Olympiakos H
0 - 2 L
56%
PAOK A
0 - 0 D
59%
Asteras A
2 - 1 W
61%
Betis A
0 - 4 L
70%
Panaitolikos H
0 - 0 D
48%
Betis H
1 - 0 W
65%
Levadiakos A
4 - 1 W
49%
OFI H
4 - 1 W
44%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.9 vs 45.1), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Dender averaging 1.0 and Panathinaikos averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Panathinaikos has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Panathinaikos has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

Dender

VS
Panathinaikos

Panathinaikos

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more