Compare Dender vs WAC

Dender vs WAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Dender vs WAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Dender Home Team

WAC Away Team

Dender

33.6

L W L L L W L L D D

Last 10 Matches

WAC

41.5

W W W L D D L D L L

Categories Won

Dender

Draw

WAC

Performance Radar

Dender

WAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match

1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match

1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference

-8

-4

Clean Sheet

20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score

70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer

D. Hrnčár (2 goals)

D. Baumgartner (2 goals)

Most Goals by Half

1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3

1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3

Home Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate

20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)

44.9

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 57.1

54.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0W / 1 matches

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)

1.01

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.01

0.97

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.07

Adjusted Power Rating

33.6

Attack: 31.6, Defense: 38.0, Form: 19.0

41.5

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 59.1, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Dender

WAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 31.6

Defense 38.0

Form 19.0

Consistency 59.2

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 31.3

Defense 59.1

Form 31.3

Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

57.1 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%

Dender

WAC

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

ZW A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

59%

La Louvière H

Belgian First Division A

2 - 1 W

38%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian First Division A

1 - 2 L

51%

Cercle Brugge H

Belgian First Division A

1 - 4 L

46%

ZW H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 2 L

65%

La Louvière A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 0 W

54%

Gent H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

1 - 3 L

58%

R. Union SG A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 2 L

80%

Charleroi H

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

2 - 2 D

57%

Cercle Brugge A

Belgian Jupiler Pro League

0 - 0 D

63%

Opponent Breakdown

League

Score

Opp. Quality

Ried A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 0 W

55%

Altach A

Austrian Bundesliga

4 - 1 W

48%

GAK H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 0 W

53%

BW Linz A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 3 L

60%

BW Linz H

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

55%

Ried H

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 0 D

50%

WSG Tirol A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 3 L

48%

Altach H

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 1 D

43%

GAK A

Austrian Bundesliga

0 - 2 L

58%

LASK A

Austrian Bundesliga

1 - 3 L

69%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 44.9 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Dender averaging 1.0 and WAC averaging 0.9 goals per match.

WAC has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Dender's 1.8.

WAC has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

WAC has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Dender

WAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair