Skip to content
Compare Feyenoord vs Como

Feyenoord vs Como Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Feyenoord vs Como: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Feyenoord Feyenoord Home Team
Como Como Away Team
Feyenoord
53.2
D W W D D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Como
62.2
W D W L L L D W W W

Categories Won

3

Feyenoord

1

Draw

11

Como

Performance Radar

Feyenoord
Como

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Ueda (7 goals)
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.9

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

63.4

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 65.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.24

2.05

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25

Adjusted Power Rating
53.2

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 62.3, Form: 41.6

62.2

Attack: 68.0, Defense: 71.8, Form: 56.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
4

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Feyenoord
Como
Feyenoord

Power Rating Breakdown

53.2

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 62.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 63.7
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

62.2

Overall

Attack 68.0
Defense 71.8
Form 56.7
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 85.5

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 65.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%
Feyenoord logo Feyenoord
D
AZ (67%)
W
Fortuna (61%)
W
Groningen (61%)
D
NEC (69%)
D
Volendam (54%)
D
Ajax (62%)
W
Excelsior (54%)
D
NAC (54%)
Como logo Como
W
Verona (55%)
D
Napoli (74%)
W
Genoa (67%)
L
Inter Milan (66%)
L
Sassuolo (69%)
L
Inter Milan (78%)
D
Udinese (79%)
W
Pisa (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ H
1 - 1 D
67%
Fortuna A
2 - 1 W
61%
Groningen H
3 - 1 W
61%
NEC A
1 - 1 D
69%
Volendam A
0 - 0 D
54%
Ajax H
1 - 1 D
62%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
NAC A
3 - 3 D
54%
Twente A
0 - 2 L
81%
Telstar H
2 - 1 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Verona A
1 - 0 W
55%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
74%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
67%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
66%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
69%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
78%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
79%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
40%
Roma H
2 - 1 W
70%
Cagliari A
2 - 1 W
58%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.9 vs 63.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Como holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Feyenoord's 1.5, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Feyenoord conceding 1.2 and Como conceding 1.1 per match.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Como has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Feyenoord

Feyenoord

VS
Como

Como

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more