Skip to content
Compare Feyenoord vs Cremonese

Feyenoord vs Cremonese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Feyenoord vs Cremonese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Feyenoord Feyenoord Home Team
Cremonese Cremonese Away Team
Feyenoord
53.2
D W W D D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Cremonese
36.5
W L L D L L W L L L

Categories Won

9

Feyenoord

2

Draw

4

Cremonese

Performance Radar

Feyenoord
Cremonese

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Ueda (7 goals)
F. Bonazzoli (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.9

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

57.7

League Difficulty: 90.0, Opponent Quality: 62.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.24

1.12

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
53.2

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 62.3, Form: 41.6

36.5

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 46.7, Form: 21.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

2
Feyenoord
Cremonese
Feyenoord

Power Rating Breakdown

53.2

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 62.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 63.7
Cremonese

Power Rating Breakdown

36.5

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 46.7
Form 21.5
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 90.0

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 62.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Feyenoord logo Feyenoord
D
AZ (67%)
W
Fortuna (61%)
W
Groningen (61%)
D
NEC (69%)
D
Volendam (54%)
D
Ajax (62%)
W
Excelsior (54%)
D
NAC (54%)
Cremonese logo Cremonese
W
Pisa (40%)
L
Lazio (70%)
L
Napoli (79%)
D
Torino (69%)
L
Cagliari (58%)
L
Bologna (58%)
W
Parma (62%)
L
Fiorentina (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ H
1 - 1 D
67%
Fortuna A
2 - 1 W
61%
Groningen H
3 - 1 W
61%
NEC A
1 - 1 D
69%
Volendam A
0 - 0 D
54%
Ajax H
1 - 1 D
62%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
NAC A
3 - 3 D
54%
Twente A
0 - 2 L
81%
Telstar H
2 - 1 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pisa H
3 - 0 W
40%
Lazio H
1 - 2 L
70%
Napoli A
0 - 4 L
79%
Torino H
0 - 0 D
69%
Cagliari A
0 - 1 L
58%
Bologna H
1 - 2 L
58%
Parma A
2 - 0 W
62%
Fiorentina H
1 - 4 L
66%
Lecce A
1 - 2 L
58%
AC Milan H
0 - 2 L
60%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.9 vs 57.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Feyenoord holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus Cremonese's 0.9, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Feyenoord has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Cremonese's 1.7.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Feyenoord emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (53.2 vs 36.5) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Feyenoord

Feyenoord

VS
Cremonese

Cremonese

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more