Skip to content
Compare Feyenoord vs Istra

Feyenoord vs Istra Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Feyenoord vs Istra: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Feyenoord Feyenoord Home Team
Istra Istra Away Team
Feyenoord
53.2
D W W D D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Istra
35.8
W W L L L L L W W L

Categories Won

10

Feyenoord

3

Draw

2

Istra

Performance Radar

Feyenoord
Istra

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Ueda (7 goals)
S. Prevljak (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.9

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

34.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.24

0.93

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
53.2

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 62.3, Form: 41.6

35.8

Attack: 28.2, Defense: 47.9, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
4

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

1

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

3
Feyenoord
Istra
Feyenoord

Power Rating Breakdown

53.2

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 62.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 63.7
Istra

Power Rating Breakdown

35.8

Overall

Attack 28.2
Defense 47.9
Form 33.8
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 47.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Feyenoord logo Feyenoord
D
AZ (67%)
W
Fortuna (61%)
W
Groningen (61%)
D
NEC (69%)
D
Volendam (54%)
D
Ajax (62%)
W
Excelsior (54%)
D
NAC (54%)
Istra logo Istra
W
Osijek (46%)
W
Slaven (35%)
L
Gorica (50%)
L
Dinamo Zagreb (71%)
L
Vukovar (32%)
L
Lokomotiva (49%)
L
Hajduk (53%)
W
Varaždin (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ H
1 - 1 D
67%
Fortuna A
2 - 1 W
61%
Groningen H
3 - 1 W
61%
NEC A
1 - 1 D
69%
Volendam A
0 - 0 D
54%
Ajax H
1 - 1 D
62%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
NAC A
3 - 3 D
54%
Twente A
0 - 2 L
81%
Telstar H
2 - 1 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Osijek A
1 - 0 W
46%
Slaven H
3 - 1 W
35%
Gorica A
0 - 1 L
50%
Dinamo Zagreb H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vukovar H
1 - 2 L
32%
Lokomotiva A
0 - 2 L
49%
Hajduk H
1 - 3 L
53%
Varaždin H
2 - 1 W
48%
Rijeka A
2 - 0 W
48%
Osijek H
0 - 1 L
40%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Feyenoord has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.9) compared to Istra (SoS: 34.5). This means Feyenoord's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Feyenoord holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus Istra's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Feyenoord conceding 1.2 and Istra conceding 1.3 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Feyenoord emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (53.2 vs 35.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Feyenoord

Feyenoord

VS
Istra

Istra

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more