Skip to content
Compare Feyenoord vs Lens

Feyenoord vs Lens Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Feyenoord vs Lens: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Feyenoord Feyenoord Home Team
Lens Lens Away Team
Feyenoord
53.2
D W W D D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Lens
58.8
W D D W W L W L W D

Categories Won

5

Feyenoord

2

Draw

8

Lens

Performance Radar

Feyenoord
Lens

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Ueda (7 goals)
F. Thauvin (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

100%

5W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.9

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

50.7

League Difficulty: 77.8, Opponent Quality: 56.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.24

2.54

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
53.2

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 62.3, Form: 41.6

58.8

Attack: 77.2, Defense: 50.4, Form: 50.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

3
4

46-60'

7
1

61-75'

5
3

76-90+'

3
Feyenoord
Lens
Feyenoord

Power Rating Breakdown

53.2

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 62.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 63.7
Lens

Power Rating Breakdown

58.8

Overall

Attack 77.2
Defense 50.4
Form 50.4
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 77.8

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 56.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Feyenoord logo Feyenoord
D
AZ (67%)
W
Fortuna (61%)
W
Groningen (61%)
D
NEC (69%)
D
Volendam (54%)
D
Ajax (62%)
W
Excelsior (54%)
D
NAC (54%)
Lens logo Lens
W
Nantes (51%)
D
Nice (60%)
D
Brest (61%)
W
Toulouse (40%)
W
Toulouse (57%)
L
Lille (78%)
W
Angers (47%)
L
Lorient (69%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ H
1 - 1 D
67%
Fortuna A
2 - 1 W
61%
Groningen H
3 - 1 W
61%
NEC A
1 - 1 D
69%
Volendam A
0 - 0 D
54%
Ajax H
1 - 1 D
62%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
NAC A
3 - 3 D
54%
Twente A
0 - 2 L
81%
Telstar H
2 - 1 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nantes H
1 - 0 W
51%
Nice A
1 - 1 D
60%
Brest A
3 - 3 D
61%
Toulouse H
4 - 1 W
40%
Toulouse H
3 - 2 W
57%
Lille A
0 - 3 L
78%
Angers H
5 - 1 W
47%
Lorient A
1 - 2 L
69%
Metz H
3 - 0 W
43%
Lyon A
2 - 2 D
54%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.9 vs 50.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Lens holds the attacking edge with 2.3 goals per match versus Feyenoord's 1.5, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Feyenoord has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Lens's 1.5.

The home advantage factor favors Lens, who boasts a 100% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Lens has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Feyenoord

Feyenoord

VS
Lens

Lens

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more