Skip to content
Compare Feyenoord vs OFK

Feyenoord vs OFK Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Feyenoord vs OFK: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Feyenoord Feyenoord Home Team
OFK OFK Away Team
Feyenoord
53.2
D W W D D D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

OFK
48.0
D L D D W D W D D D

Categories Won

9

Feyenoord

3

Draw

3

OFK

Performance Radar

Feyenoord
OFK

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

20%

2W, 7D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Ueda (7 goals)
Y. Silué (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.9

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 62.7

52.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.24

1.33

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
53.2

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 62.3, Form: 41.6

48.0

Attack: 47.7, Defense: 64.7, Form: 20.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

6
2

31-45'

4

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

4
Feyenoord
OFK
Feyenoord

Power Rating Breakdown

53.2

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 62.3
Form 41.6
Consistency 63.7
OFK

Power Rating Breakdown

48.0

Overall

Attack 47.7
Defense 64.7
Form 20.4
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

62.7 vs 50.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Feyenoord logo Feyenoord
D
AZ (67%)
W
Fortuna (61%)
W
Groningen (61%)
D
NEC (69%)
D
Volendam (54%)
D
Ajax (62%)
W
Excelsior (54%)
D
NAC (54%)
OFK logo OFK
D
Partizan (57%)
L
Železničar P (62%)
D
Radnik (50%)
D
Čukarički (46%)
W
Novi Pazar (46%)
D
Radnik (50%)
W
Radnički Niš (49%)
D
FK IMT (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ H
1 - 1 D
67%
Fortuna A
2 - 1 W
61%
Groningen H
3 - 1 W
61%
NEC A
1 - 1 D
69%
Volendam A
0 - 0 D
54%
Ajax H
1 - 1 D
62%
Excelsior H
2 - 1 W
54%
NAC A
3 - 3 D
54%
Twente A
0 - 2 L
81%
Telstar H
2 - 1 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Partizan A
1 - 1 D
57%
Železničar P A
0 - 2 L
62%
Radnik H
1 - 1 D
50%
Čukarički H
0 - 0 D
46%
Novi Pazar A
5 - 1 W
46%
Radnik H
0 - 0 D
50%
Radnički Niš A
2 - 1 W
49%
FK IMT H
3 - 3 D
58%
Napredak A
2 - 2 D
34%
Radnički Krag H
0 - 0 D
52%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 53.9 vs 52.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Feyenoord averaging 1.5 and OFK averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Feyenoord conceding 1.2 and OFK conceding 1.1 per match.

OFK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Feyenoord has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.2 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Feyenoord

Feyenoord

VS
OFK

OFK

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more